3rd version :I deleted the comparisons between
pm &
mj, because there are exceptions for the
Xoridinae which do not allow to generalize.
Of where this 3rd version.
-----
2nd version :I had based the determination of
P.(Calliclisis) on 2 photos of species a priori well determined, in fact they were not her (The 2 photos disappeared of the Net) !
The shape of the nervures observed on photos, thus did not characterize the
Calliclisis.
Of where this 2nd version.
=====================
Biblio.Broad : Identification key to the subfamilies of Ichneumonidae (Hymenoptera) [
Only on Internet ?]
Clément 1938 : Opuscula Hymenopterologica. IV . Die paläarktischen Arten der Pimplinentribus ... in "Festschrift zum 60. Geburtstage von Professor Dr. Embrik Strand - Vol.4 p.502/569"
Constantineanu 1977 : Fauna Republicii socialiste România - Vol. IX - fasc.7 [
With the exception of the drawings, it seems that a big part of this book is only a translation of Clément]
Fitton & aii. 1988 : RES Handbooks - Vol. 7 - part.1 - p.74/83
Townes : The Genera of Ichneumonidae - Vol. 1 - 3 & 4
---
Dicky S. Yu, Cornelis van Achterberg & Klaus Horstmann http://www.taxapad.com/global.php-----------
These keys
owe a lot to the work of
Gavin Broad (The key concerns only Great Britain)
They also take into account genera & species absent in Great Britain.
----
Thanks for
F. di Giovanni (
Eopteryx) who allowed me to improve the table of Keys of genera & sub-genera.
----
Fundamental characteristics of
Poemeniinae &
Xoridinae :
- Forewings with vein 2m-cu present
- Head sub-spherical (obvious character, more or less obvious for some other
Ichneumonidae)
-
Poemeniinae (excluded
Pseudorhyssa) :
Epicnemial carina entirely absent.
-
Pseudorhyssa (sub-family
Poemeniinae) :
Mesoscutum with conspicuous transverse rugae & Epicnemial carina present.
-
Xoridinae :
Mesoscutum without transverse rugae & Epicnemial carina present.
There is obviously other numerous
Ichneumonidae which also possess these caracteristics, thus let us see the determination of the 2 sub-families object of the present message.
-----
KEY of 2 sub-families :01 Mesoscutum (
see as the drawing) with conspicuous transverse rugae across entire surface. ... Then
02--. If not .......................................................................................................................... Then
0302 Median longitudinal carinae of propodeum present
& Occipital carina medio-dorsally complete.
.... Then
Pseudorhyssa 03 Spiracle of 1st tergite around the middle of the tergite
or in the anterior half.
....
& Length of the sternaulus <1/2 width of the mesopleuron.
....
& Areolet of forewings is absent
or if present : not rhombic.
....
& Clypeus separated from face by a groove
or transverse impression (the whole surface not strongly bulging)
....
& Metasoma without grooves delimiting a triangular pattern on tergites 3-4.
....
& Scutellum without long backwards-directed thorn.
....
& Areolet of forewing not obliquely quadrate. ... Then
0404 Epicnemial carina absent ... Then
05--. Epicnemial carina present ... Then
0605 Tarsal claws simple (not pectinate)
or with a single accessory tooth.
....
& Mandible unidentate, chisel-like,
or if bidentate : the lower tooth is longer than upper.
.... Then
Poemeniinae (excluded
Pseudorhyssa)
06 Areolet of forewings is absent
& not open on the left (on the right forewing).
....
& Mandible with 1
or 2 teeth (not appearing tridentate).
....
& Tarsal claws simple (not pectinate)
or with a single accessory tooth.
....
& Vein 2m-cu of forewings with 2 bullae.
....
& Femur 3 with a large ventral tooth
or mandible with a single tooth
or frons with a median horn. ... Then
0707 ♀ ... Then
08--. ♂ ... Then
0908 Ovipositor
without nodus
neither notch
nor ventral teeth.
....
& 5th tarsal segment not broader than other tarsal segments.
.... Then
Xoridinae ♀09 Flagellomeres without semi-circular excavations.
.... Then
Xoridinae ♂-----
Keys of genera & sub-genera, see table at the end of message.---
Photos (sure determination) on our Forum & Internet :
