I examined again the male which I had determined as Eutomostethus luteiventris.
The error which I committed was to use the presence or not of Prepectus (according to Benson, they are "not very clear").
==================
Capture in Cne : Châteauneuf-Val-de-Bargis (départ. Nièvre) - 01 VI 2011
======
Biblio :
- Benson 1952 : RES - Handbooks ... Symphyta ... Vol. VI 2(a) & 2(b)
- on the Net (see with http://www.royensoc.co.uk/content/out-print-handbooks )
- Smith 1969 : Nearctic Sawflies ... Blennocampinae ... in” Technical Bulletin No. 1397 - U.S. Dept. of Agri.”
--------
* Det. of sub-Family Blennocampinae (sensu Berland) , see :
----
* Det. of Genus & species
- Characteristics of our capture :
- Vein A2 rectilinear.
The Veins M & 1m-cu do not converge the one on the other one.
Tergits marqued with orange-red.
Namely : Pareophora pruni , Monophadnoides ruficruris , Monophadnus spinolae.
Pareophora pruni has :
- The Tergit 1 & the last one black AND the black Femora (Except the knees yellow-reddish), our capture has no these colours.
- Antennae with 2nd segment at most as long as broad, longer for our capture.
- Vein 2r interstitial with 3rm, our capture does not have the Vein 2r interstitial.
Of where the determination
---
NB :
- The coloring of Thorax is variable : from completely black to almost totally red (var. ruberrima).
- Also, I observed on 3 other captures that the darkening of wings was variable (no always slightly as writes it Berland)
----
spinolae was also captured in Italy mainland & Sicily
| Allegati: |
|
|