Forum Entomologi Italiani http://www.entomologiitaliani.net/public/forum/phpbb3/ |
|
Pseudamauronia danacaeoides Reitter, 1885 - Dasytidae http://www.entomologiitaliani.net/public/forum/phpbb3/viewtopic.php?f=430&t=99182 |
Pagina 1 di 1 |
Autore: | gabrif [ 18/06/2022, 12:41 ] |
Oggetto del messaggio: | Re: Pseudamauronia danacaeoides Reitter, 1885 |
Hello George, has the separation between Amauronia and Pseudoamauronia a solid base? ![]() ![]() |
Autore: | strepens [ 18/06/2022, 17:58 ] |
Oggetto del messaggio: | Re: Pseudamauronia danacaeoides Reitter, 1885 |
Hello Gabriele !!! Difficult question and unfortunately I do not have access to K. Majer's article to answer with some seriousness [Majer K., 1997: A revision of the tribe Amauronioidini (Coleoptera, Dasytidae). - Acta Musei Moraviae, Scientiae Naturales 81 (1–2): 363–402]. So, personal point of view: Yes, I believe that these are 2 different genera, which are easily distinguished from each other. - Winged insects, with parallel to each other the sides of the elytrae and clear presence of shoulders. Pronotum shape that strongly resembles the genus Danacaea .............................................Pseudamauronia Pic, 1915 - Wingless insects, with curved sides of the elytrae and barely distinct shoulders. Different shape of pronotum ............................................. Amauronia Westwood, 1839 (= Aphyctus Jacquelin du Val, 1860). M. Pic also mentions small differences in the shape of the eyes and the claws, between the 2 genera. But comparing my specimens, I find them insignificant. ![]() ![]() George |
Autore: | strepens [ 18/06/2022, 19:02 ] |
Oggetto del messaggio: | Re: Pseudamauronia danacaeoides Reitter, 1885 |
OK, I had the article of K. Majer (by G. L. ![]() ![]() Also Majer considers that Amauronia and Pseudamauronia are 2 different genera. At the end of his work, there is a cladogram based on 38 characters, which seems to fully confirm this possibility. ![]() ![]() G. |
Autore: | gabrif [ 19/06/2022, 10:54 ] |
Oggetto del messaggio: | Re: Pseudamauronia danacaeoides Reitter, 1885 |
I see, I have some to determine myself, I will try with the paper. I am becoming more and more skeptical about this "traditional" approach. The criterion was to put all winged species in one genus and all wingless ones in another one -- but how can we be sure that loss of wings was a single event for all of them? ![]() ![]() |
Pagina 1 di 1 | Tutti gli orari sono UTC + 1 ora [ ora legale ] |
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |